top of page
  • Writer's pictureVik F.

New Legislation Sparks Controversy Over Future of Gig Work in America

The gig economy, which has become an integral part of American life, is at the forefront of a heated debate as new rules from the Biden administration seek to redefine the landscape of independent contracting.

On Monday, the Department of Labor's rule outlining new criteria for gig worker classification under the Federal Labor Standards Act took effect. This rule could potentially alter the definition of gig work, extending benefits typically reserved for employees, such as federal minimum wage and Social Security, to millions of independent contractors. However, there is concern that this change could stifle hiring practices and squeeze genuine contract workers out of the market.

A woman and two men in a carpentry workshop focused on a laptop on a wooden table. The woman, seated, is by notebooks, while the standing men lean in, suggesting a group project discussion. The background shows woodworking tools and materials.

A significant portion of the U.S. workforce is engaged in gig work, with at least 25 percent involved in some form of independent contracting and about 10 percent relying on it as their primary income source. The allure of flexibility, both in scheduling and location, has steadily drawn more people into the gig economy over the last decade.

The legal and political tug-of-war over worker classification saw the Trump administration attempt to streamline the standard, only to have it challenged by the Biden administration's new rule. The latter introduces a six-factor test without a hierarchical structure, leading to apprehension among businesses and independent contractors about the potential for legal ambiguity and a bias towards employee classification.

In response, Senator Bill Cassidy and GOP Representative Kevin Kiley have sponsored Congressional Review Act resolutions to block the rule, supported by industry groups like the Coalition for Workforce Innovation and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. These resolutions, along with lawsuits against the Department of Labor, underscore the fear that the rule's broad scope may lead to misclassification, hurting both small businesses and self-employed individuals who could be erroneously seen as employees.

Uber, a significant player in the gig economy, expressed minimal concern over the rule change, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the independence their drivers enjoy. Conversely, freelance writers and editors worry about losing business if their contributions are seen as too integral to an employer's operations, potentially misclassifying them under the new guidelines.

The Biden administration and labor advocates maintain that the rule aims to correct "misclassifications" and protect workers, particularly those at risk of exploitation. However, the precise impact of misclassification and the new rule's effects remain to be fully understood, as individuals would need to challenge their status to see change.

With the new rule now in force, the future of the gig economy is uncertain. The outcome of the legal battles and the resolution proposed by Senator Cassidy could significantly impact how businesses approach independent contracting and how gig workers navigate their livelihoods.

This legislation and ongoing debate highlight the critical juncture at which the American labor market stands, balancing the flexibility of gig work with the security and benefits of traditional employment. As these issues unfold, the gig economy continues to represent a vital and evolving segment of the national conversation about the future of work.




Ready to sip, smile, and succeed? Channel your passion as a Dragon Brand Ambassador, sharing the magic of top-tier beverage brands. Sign up and make your mark!

bottom of page